Posts tagged law

Posted 2 months ago
This is what happens when friends let friends vote Republican!The Supreme Court and Federal Courts have been stocked with ultra-right wing conservative activist judges who serve the interests of the richest 1% of Americans and big corporations. This is why everyone needs to get involved personally and do something to help out.Chart Source: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/supreme-court-may-be-most-conservative-in-modern-history/My deeper analysis: http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/04/12/restoring-balance-to-the-supreme-court/

This is what happens when friends let friends vote Republican!

The Supreme Court and Federal Courts have been stocked with ultra-right wing conservative activist judges who serve the interests of the richest 1% of Americans and big corporations. This is why everyone needs to get involved personally and do something to help out.

Chart Source: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/supreme-court-may-be-most-conservative-in-modern-history/

My deeper analysis: http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/04/12/restoring-balance-to-the-supreme-court/

Posted 2 months ago

The US Constitution is not based on biblical law

One of the favorite arguments of theocrats trying to justify violating the secular nature of our constitution is to claim that the basis of our legal structure is biblical law. Below, Austin Cline debunks this myth one commandment at a time. The parent article can be found athttp://atheism.about.com/od/tencommandments/a/americanlaw_2.htm

1. Thou Shalt Have No Other Gods Beside Me
There definitely aren’t any laws that forbid the worship of all but one god, much less the specific god of the ancient Hebrews. In fact, American law in general is silent on the existence of gods. Christians have inserted references to their God in various places, for example the Pledge of Allegiance and the National Motto, but for the most part the law doesn’t insist that any gods exist - and who would want that to change?

2. Thou Shalt Not Worship Any Graven Images
This Commandment has the same basic legal problems as the first. There is nothing in American law that even hints at the idea that there is something wrong with worshipping “graven images.” If such a law existed it would infringe upon the religious liberties of those whose religions include “graven images” — which, according to some, would include Catholics and many other Christian denominations.

3. Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of the Lord Thy God in Vain
As with the first two Commandments, this is a purely religious requirement that is not expressed in American law anymore. There was a time when blasphemy was punished. If it were still possible to prosecute people for blasphemy (a common, but not necessarily accurate, interpretation of this Commandment), it would be an infringement on religious liberty.

4. Remember the Sabbath Day to Rest and Keep it Holy
There was a time in America when the laws mandated that shops close on the Christian sabbath and people attend church. The latter provisions fell away first and, over time, the former began to disappear as well. Today it is difficult to find laws that enforce any sort of “sabbath rest” and none that enforce keeping a sabbath “holy.” The reasons are obvious: this is a religious matter which the government has no authority over.

5. Honor Thy Father and Thy Mother
This is a Commandment that is a good idea in principle, but to which many good exceptions can be found and which is completely impractical as a law. Not only are there no laws specifically designed to require this, it would be difficult to find any laws that express it as a principle even some remote sense. A person who curses, ignores, or says bad things about their parents breaks no laws.

6. Thou Shalt Not Murder
Finally, a Commandment that forbids something that is also forbidden in American law — and we only had to go through half of the Commandments to get to this point! Unfortunately for Ten Commandments advocates, this is also something forbidden in every known culture on the planet. Are all of these laws based upon the Sixth Commandment?

7. Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery
Once upon a time, adultery was illegal and could be punished by the state. Today that is no longer the case. The absence of laws prohibiting adultery prevents anyone from arguing that current American law is in any way based upon the Seventh Commandment. Unlike other such Commandments, though, it would be possible to change the laws to reflect this one. The question to supporters of the Ten Commandments, then, is this: do they openly advocate the criminalization of adultery and, if not, how does that square with their insistence that the Ten Commandments be endorsed, promoted, and displayed by the state?

8. Thou Shalt Not Steal
Here we come across just the second of ten Commandments that forbids something also forbidden in American law — and, as with the Sixth, this is also something forbidden in all other cultures as well, including those that predate the Ten Commandments. Are all laws against theft based upon the Eighth Commandment?

9. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness
Whether this Commandment has any parallels in American laws depends upon how one interprets it. If this is simply a prohibition against lying in general, then it is not expressed in American law. If, however, this is a prohibition against lying in the course of court testimony, then it is true that American law also forbids this. Then again, so do other cultures.

10. Thou Shalt Not Covet Anything That is Thy Neighbor’s
As with honoring one’s parents, a command to refrain from coveting may be a reasonable principle (depending upon how it is applied) but that doesn’t mean that it is something that can or should be enforced by the law. There is nothing in American law that even comes close to forbidding coveting. 

Conclusion
Of the ten Commandments, only three have any parallels in American law, so if anyone wanted to argue that the Commandments are somehow the “basis” for our laws, these are the only three they have to work with. Unfortunately, similar parallels exist with every other culture and it’s not reasonable to say that the Ten Commandments are the basis for all laws. There is simply no reason to think that the people crafting American or British law sat down and prohibited theft or murder merely because the Ten Commandments already did so. 

History   Atheism   Secular   Constitution   America   USA   christianity  Freedomofreligion   FreedomFromReligion   1stAmendment  

Posted 1 year ago
Do you see what happens?  Do you see what happens Larry?  THIS is what happens when you vote Republican.

Do you see what happens?  Do you see what happens Larry?  THIS is what happens when you vote Republican.

Posted 1 year ago

The conservatives have been trying to spread a picture of a Trayvon all day long that makes him appear like a bad young man, supposedly to mean that we shouldn’t sympathize with him getting shot and killed.  The problem is, that is not the Trayvon Martin from Florida who was killed, it’s a different Trayvon from Georgia, and doesn’t even look like him. 

Not surprised this lie came from the Breitbart camp. They have a long established legacy of distortions, taking things out of context, complete fabrications, and outright lies in their propaganda.  While they’ve retracted their claim, Michelle Malkin and thousands of other cons are continuing to deliberately spreading the picture.

More on this here: http://www.streetwisepundit.com/wrong-trayvon-martin-photo-on-facebook.html

Posted 1 year ago

Ginsburg, Breyer: Rethink Citizens United - UPI.com

Supreme Court should revisit its decision on campaign finance in the Citizens United case, two justices said as they stayed a Montana ruling.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer suggested events since the court ruled in 2010 that corporations can make unlimited contributions to political action committees not directly controlled by candidates have cast doubt on the wisdom of the decision.

The court’s decision Friday in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was 5-4, with Ginsburg and Breyer in the minority.

“Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations ‘do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption,’” Ginsburg wrote. “A petition for certiorari will give the court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway.”

The Montana Supreme Court upheld the state’s campaign spending limits, which have been in force for a century.